Legal Opinion
Wichman v. Hughes
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided February 23, 1970No. 5-5155PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
The only question presented by this appeal is whether the defendantappellee, Tom Hughes, has sufficiently transacted business in Arkansas to allow our courts to exercise personal jurisdiction over him under the Uniform Interstate and International Procedure Act, Ark. Stat. Ann., Title 27, Ch. 25 (Supp. 1969). The trial court answered that question in the negative and therefore granted the defendant’s motion to quash service.
The facts are agreed upon by stipulation. The plaintiff Wichman sells horses at his home north of Huntsville, in Madison county. In November,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- National Gas Appliance Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ab Electrolux, a Swedish CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
- Kropp Forge Co. v. JawitzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
- Griffiths & Sprague Stevedoring Co. v. Bayly, Martin & Fay, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mountaire Feeds, Inc. v. Agro Impex, S. A., a Panamanian CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Tietloff v. Lift-A-Loft Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Nix v. DunavantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Martin v. Kelley Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1974
- United Accounts, Inc. v. QuackenbushNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.