Legal Opinion

Tietloff v. Lift-A-Loft Corp.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 1982No. 2-881A280PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Randy Tietloff, plaintiff below, 1 appeals an adverse judgment in his action to enforce an Arkansas default judgment against Lift-A-Loft Corporation (Lift-ALoft), defendant below. The only issue presented is whether the trial court erred in determining that the Arkansas state court lacked personal jurisdiction over Lift-ALoft.

The facts of record are simple and substantially without conflict. In 1975, Tiet-loff, an Arkansas resident, contacted Bob Duncan, then vice-president in charge of the equipment division of Lift-A-Loft, an Indiana corporation, in an effort to interest the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Nucor Corporation v. Aceros Y Maquilas De Occidente, S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Tom-Wat, Inc. v. FinkIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Mullen v. CogdellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Mid-States Aircraft Engines, Inc. v. Mize Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Woodmar Coin Center, Inc. v. OwenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API