United States v. Carlyle
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the government’s motion to disqualify Charles F. Daum as counsel for defendant Cecilio A Carlyle. The government argues that Mr. Daum has actual and potential conflicts of interest caused by his simultaneous representation of Mr. Carlyle in this case and another client in a separate criminal case in federal court in West Virginia.
The Court held an extensive hearing on April 2, 1997, where both parties presented argument on the motion. The Court subsequently appointed Hamilton P. Fox, III as counsel for Mr.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Willie George ChildressCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crittendon v. MULDROWDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2025
- Crittendon v. MULDROWDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
- United States v. SuttonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- United States v. SuttonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021