Legal Opinion

United States v. Carlyle

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 8, 1997No. Criminal No. 97-0081(PLF)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the government’s motion to disqualify Charles F. Daum as counsel for defendant Cecilio A Carlyle. The government argues that Mr. Daum has actual and potential conflicts of interest caused by his simultaneous representation of Mr. Carlyle in this case and another client in a separate criminal case in federal court in West Virginia.

The Court held an extensive hearing on April 2, 1997, where both parties presented argument on the motion. The Court subsequently appointed Hamilton P. Fox, III as counsel for Mr.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. Willie George ChildressCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crittendon v. MULDROWDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2025
  2. Crittendon v. MULDROWDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
  3. United States v. SuttonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
  4. United States v. SuttonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API