Crittendon v. MULDROW
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 AJEENAH CRITTENDON, et al., 10 Case No. 22-cv-09153-RS Plaintiffs, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 12 TRANSFER VENUE ANGELICA MULDROW, 13 Defendant. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Pro se Defendant Angelica Muldrow moves to transfer venue in this matter, which has 17 been partially reopened after the Ninth Circuit’s mandate, to the Northern District of Georgia. 18 Muldrow argues the availability of witnesses to testify, Muldrow’s own financial limitations, and 19 the judicial efficiency of litigating in a forum where…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Jack W. SavageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.