Graus v. Kaladjian
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
RAKOFF, District Judge.
Once the state confers Medicaid benefits on an eligible individual, it may not thereafter terminate such benefits because of subsequent loss of eligibility without affording the individual due process. But does the individual also have a right, enforceable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 1 to challenge the ways in which procedures and mechanisms that led to such termination violated Medicaid’s administrative rules? The answer, in terms of this case, is no.
Medicaid is a federally funded program of medical assistance for needy people that, in the case of New York…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Wright v. City of Roanoke Redevelopment & Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Harris v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Reynolds v. GiulianiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Reynolds v. GiulianiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Smith v. PalmerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1998
- Fishman v. DainesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Rabin v. Wilson-CokerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.