Legal Opinion
Rabin v. Wilson-Coker
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 29, 2003No. 3:03-CV-555 RNCPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER
CHATIGNY, District Judge.
This litigation stems from budget deficit reduction legislation approved by the Connecticut General Assembly in February 2003, known as Public Act 03-02. Among other budget-cutting measures, the General Assembly undertook to reduce the State’s Medicaid expenditures effective April 1 by tightening income eligibility limits for certain adults and eliminating one form of continuous eligibility coverage for children. In March, plaintiffs brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to prevent termination of their Medicaid benefits by the Department of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Blessing v. FreestoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rabin v. Wilson-CokerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- M.A.C. v. BetitDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2003
- Rabin v. Wilson-CokerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Mendez v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Kapps v. WingDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.