Legal Opinion

Graham v. Drydock Coal Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1996No. 1995-0313PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 76 Ohio St.3d 311.] GRAHAM, APPELLANT, v. DRYDOCK COAL COMPANY, APPELLEE; HOLMES ET. AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Graham v. Drydock Coal Co.,

1996-Ohio-393.] Mining—Deed severing mineral estate from surface estate, and reserving right to use surface incident to mining coal, does not reserve right to strip-mine to mineral owner, when. A deed which severs a mineral estate from a surface estate, and which grants or reserves the right to use the surface incident to mining coal, in language peculiarly applicable to deep-mining techniques,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Kelly v. Medical Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Shifrin v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance v. Guman Bros. FarmOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Graham v. Drydock Coal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Michael A. Gerard, Inc. v. HaffkeOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Ihenacho v. Ohio Inst. of Photography & TechnologyOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Harder Invests., L.L.C. v. Perin-Tyler Family Found., L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025
  4. Owusu v. Hope Cancer Ctr. of Northwest Ohio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Setzekorn v. Kost USA, Inc., Ca2008-02-017 (3-9-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API