Legal Opinion

Exhaust Ventilator Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1887PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from the County Court of Milwaukee County. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion. They contended that a contract for the sale 'of goods on approval cannot be rescinded by the vendee without a return or offer to return the property. Benjamin on Sales, sec. 595; Paige v. McMillan, 41 Wis. 337, 340; Gammon v. Abrams, 53 id. 323, 327; First Nat.

Read the full summary

APPEAL from the County Court of Milwaukee County. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion. They contended that a contract for the sale 'of goods on approval cannot be rescinded by the vendee without a return or offer to return the property. Benjamin on Sales, sec. 595; Paige v. McMillan, 41 Wis. 337, 340; Gammon v. Abrams, 53 id. 323, 327; First Nat. Bk. v-. Larsen, 60 id. 206, 217; 2 Schouler on Real Pr. secs. 308, 312; Humphries v. Carvalho, 16 East, 45; Story on Sales, secs. 128-130; Dewey v. Erie Borough, 14 Pa. St. 211; Hartford Sorghum, etc. Co. v. Brush, 48 Yt. 528; Johnson v.…

1Opinion of the CourtOrton, J.

The written contract upon which this suit was brought was as follows, to wit: “ I agree to furnish C., M. & St. P. N’y Oo. three 60-inch Blackman’s exhaust fans, for their blacksmith shop in South Minneapolis, for the sum of $600, and guaranty that they will exhaust the smoke and gases in a satisfactory manner; if not, we will furnish a sufficient number to do the work without extra charge. The same not to be paid for until satisfactory to the C., M. & St. P. N’y Co. [Signed] Thomas Phillips, Agent.” Which proposition was then and there accepted in. writing at the foot of it, as follows:…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hunt v. WymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Daggett & Graves v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1877
  3. Exhaust Ventilator Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  4. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. ChesrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  5. Phelps v. WhitakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mulcahy v. DieudonneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  2. Warder v. WhitishWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Snouffer v. City of TiptonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  4. W. W. Kimball Co. v. MasseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Frey-Sheckler Co. v. Iowa Brick Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API