United States v. Ilario Zannino
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McENTEE, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Zannino, Balliro, Limone, and Strauss were convicted for transporting or aiding and abetting the transport of goods in interstate commerce knowing the same to have been stolen. Appellants filed a motion for new trial based upon newly discovered evidence. This motion was denied. In United States v. Strauss, 443 F.2d 986 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 851, 92 S.Ct. 87, 30 L.Ed.2d 90 (1971) 1 we affirmed this denial and the underlying convictions. Shortly thereafter appellants filed a second motion for new trial based upon alleged additional newly discovered…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Halliday v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Ronald Leaching, United States of America v. Jerome TremontCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- United States v. StraussCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. WinterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Joseph J. C. Dicarlo and Ronald C. MacKenzieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Henry James Wright, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Joseph Indelicato, United States of America v. Richard F. NutileCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Zannino v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.