United States v. Clifford Paul Coleman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
Appellant was convicted in a trial without a jury and sentenced for refusal to submit to induction into the armed forces in violation of 50 U.S.C.App. § 462. We reverse. We state the facts appearing in Coleman’s selective service file to the extent that they are pertinent to our decision.
In Coleman’s classification questionnaire, which he filed with the Board on January 10, 1968, he answered question 2, in Series XI, which asked whether he had any physical condition which in his opinion would disqualify him, by stating: “Migraine headaches.” He also sent the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Robert Nolen Briggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Juan Manuel BarayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Ernest Stephen BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
3Cited by12 opinions
- Yongyouth Ruangswang and Vanapar Ruangswang v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- The Steamboaters, an Oregon Non-Profit Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory, Commission, Kenneth Plumb, Secretary of Ferc, Winchester Water Control District, and Elektra Power Corporation, Winchester Water Control District and Elektra Power Corporation, Intervenors. Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of Commerce v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Winchester Water Control District and Elektra Power Corporation, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Cubanski v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Carpenter v. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Cubanski v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.