Legal Opinion
Cubanski v. Heckler
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 6, 1986No. 85-7123PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Senior Circuit Judge:
The California legislature increased the amount of income a medically needy adult couple can keep for non-medical needs and still be eligible to receive Medicaid. The State submitted this amendment of its Medicaid plan to Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Heckler, who disapproved it. The California Department of Health Services (the State) and the Legal Aid Society of Alameda County (Intervenors) challenge the Secretary’s final determination. We reverse.
I. Facts
A. The Medicaid Program.
Title XIX of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq., was…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. James E. BusherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Cooper Technologies Co. v. DudasCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Cosby v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- W.C. v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Cooley v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.