Legal Opinion

In re Pittman

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided September 26, 1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of S. B. Pittman, bankrupt. On review of referee’s order denying claim of D. F. Bridgers to priority as to certain store fixtures.

1Opinion of the Court

CONNOR, District Judge.

Heard upon petition for review and certificate of Marshall C. Staton, Esq., referee. The record discloses that D. F. Bridgers filed a proof of debt biased upon note executed by the bankrupt, January 21, 1921, for $500, due on demand, with interest from date. The consideration upon which the note was executed was the loan of $500 made by Bridgers to Pittman on the date of the note. Bridgers claimed a priority in respect to certain articles of personal property consisting of store fixtures, etc. ' The trustee filed objection to the priority and, after hearing the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Casey v. CavarocSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Security Warehousing Co. v. HandSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Bush v. Export Storage Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee · 1904
  4. In re PeacockU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern North Carolina · 1910
  5. American Can Co. v. Erie Preserving Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tilles v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  2. Farmers' & Merchants' Sav. Bank v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API