Legal Opinion
State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. Ott
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided November 10, 1952No. 40843PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMITER, Justice.
These two suits, consolidated in the district court and also here because of the similarity of issues, were instituted. for the purpose of recovering the sums of $481.81 .and $191.70 which plaintiff paid under protest as ad valorem taxes to the City of New Orelans and the State of Louisiana, respectively.
For. causes of action plaintiff, a foreign automobile insurance corporation qualified to do business in Louisiana, alleged that ■the assessments under which the defendants ■collected the taxes were against certain anticipated automobile insurance premiums; that the premiums…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- State v. Rosenstream, Weiss & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
- City of Shreveport v. NejinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- Downs v. DunnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- State v. CallacSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
- State v. FourcadeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Liquefied Petroleum Gas Commission v. E. R. Kiper Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- International Business Machines Corp. v. OttSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
- Collector of Revenue v. Pioneer Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
- Union Producing Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
- D & A Construction Co. v. Jefferson Davis Parish School BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.