Legal Opinion

United States v. Evans

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 20, 1985No. ACM S26592PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

MURDOCK, Judge:

The appellant was convicted, pursuant to his pleas, of conspiring to distribute marijuana, making a false official statement to the Security Police, and possessing, distributing, and using marijuana. The appellant asserts two errors.1 We do not find merit in either one.

I

First, the appellant notes there is no addendum to the Staff Judge Advocate’s recommendation, even though the defense counsel submitted a Goode2 response. An addendum is not required unless legal errors have been raised in the Goode response. R.C.M. 1106f(7), Air Force Regulation 111-1, Military Justice…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. Cruzado-RodriguezU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
  3. United States v. FenyoU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. GunterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  2. United States v. PrivetteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  3. United States v. HaynesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  4. United States v. HanksU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
  5. United States v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API