United States v. Evans
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
MURDOCK, Judge:
The appellant was convicted, pursuant to his pleas, of conspiring to distribute marijuana, making a false official statement to the Security Police, and possessing, distributing, and using marijuana. The appellant asserts two errors.1 We do not find merit in either one.
I
First, the appellant notes there is no addendum to the Staff Judge Advocate’s recommendation, even though the defense counsel submitted a Goode2 response. An addendum is not required unless legal errors have been raised in the Goode response. R.C.M. 1106f(7), Air Force Regulation 111-1, Military Justice…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. Cruzado-RodriguezU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. FenyoU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. GunterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. PrivetteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. HaynesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. HanksU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001