Legal Opinion

State v. Burr

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 19, 1997No. 96-232PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, j.

The defendant, Richard R. Burr, petitioned the Superior Court (Morrill, J.) for annulment of his criminal record. Relying on 1994 amendments to the statute governing annulment petitions, the superior court denied the defendant’s petition without prejudice. See Laws 1994, ch. 224 (currently codified at RSA 651:5 (1996)) (the new statute). On appeal, the defendant argues that the superior court erred in applying the new statute because the defendant relied on a prior version of the statute in agreeing to plead guilty in 1989. See RSA 651:5 (Supp. 1989) (the prior statute). We affirm.

Th…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. People v. D.K.B.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. State v. ChickSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  5. State v. ComeauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. MonroeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  2. In re GoldmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  3. In re N.H. Elec. Coop., Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
  4. Appeal of Public Service Company of New Hampshire d/b/a Eversource EnergySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
  5. Cole v. HobsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API