Legal Opinion
Limerick v. Roberts
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided October 7, 1924No. 15407PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
1. Under the particular facts of this ease, and in the light of the entire charge, the court did not' err, for any reason assigned, in instructing the jury as follows:
(а) “Now there is no question in this case as to any negligence on the part of Mr. Roberts [the plaintiff]. Nobody contends or can contend ■ under the evidence in this case that he was negligent.”
(б) “I charge you further that if a servant or employee, while engaged in the business of his master, makes a slight deviation for ends of his own, the master remains liable when the’ act was so closely connected with the master’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ritchie v. WallerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Fielder v. DavisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Higgins v. . Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Lewis v. AmorousCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Danforth v. FisherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Sanders v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Gomez v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Jump v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Andrews v. NorvellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Selman v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.