Andrew James Leonard v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Circuit Judge.
The main question for determination here is: did the rendition of a verdict of guilty, in open court, against appellant for an unrelated crime, while nineteen members of the jury panel were present, so infect said panel with prejudice that the serving of five of them on the jury in the instant case violated the constitutional rights of appellant?
The case in which the guilty verdict was returned involved violations of 18 U.S.C.A. § 495, forging and uttering endorsements on government checks. The instant case involved a violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 2314, transportation of a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Marshall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States Ex Rel. Darcy v. HandySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Edward D. Patterson, Richard L. Flintoff, Jimmie R. Oglesby, and Gregory C. MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Dunaway v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- United States v. Jack OllaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Edward D. Patterson, Richard L. Flintoff, Jimmie R. Oglesby, and Gregory C. MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981