Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Clipper Mower, etc., Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided September 24, 1872PublishedCited by 6 opinions

2 [Two suits. Final hearing on pleadings and proofs. Suits brought upon reissues of two letters patent granted Cyrenus Wheeler. Jr., for “improvements in grain and grass harvesters.” The first dated December 5, 1854, was reissued January 3, 1860, in five divisions, numbered respectively S75. S76, 877, 87S, 879. Of these reissues, No. 876 was again reissued May 14, 1867. as No. 2,611). The second patent dated February 6, 1S35, was reissued June 5, 1860, as No. 971, and again.

Read the full summary

2 [Two suits. Final hearing on pleadings and proofs. Suits brought upon reissues of two letters patent granted Cyrenus Wheeler. Jr., for “improvements in grain and grass harvesters.” The first dated December 5, 1854, was reissued January 3, 1860, in five divisions, numbered respectively S75. S76, 877, 87S, 879. Of these reissues, No. 876 was again reissued May 14, 1867. as No. 2,611). The second patent dated February 6, 1S35, was reissued June 5, 1860, as No. 971, and again. May 2S. 1867, as No. 2,632. The bill in the first suit alleged infringement of reissues Nos. 875, 2.010. and 2.632. The…

1Opinion of the Court

WOODRUFF, Circuit Judge.

These suits are prosecuted for the alleged infringement of patents granted to the complainant, and seek an injunction and an account of the income derived by the defendant from such infringement. The patents in question are for improvements in grass and grain harvesters. The first original patent was granted December 5th, 1854, on an application filed March *88816th, 1854, and is numbered 12,044. This patent was surrendered in November, 1859, and reissues were granted for several separate and distinct parts of the improvements claimed to be embraced in the original patent,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Westinghouse v. New York Air-Brake Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1893
  2. Tompkins-Hawley-Fuller Co. v. HoldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  3. Comptograph Co. v. Mechanical Accountant Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1906
  4. Odell v. StoutUnited States Circuit Court · 1884
  5. Holmes Burglar Alarm Tel. Co. v. Domestic Telegraph & Telephone Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API