Legal Opinion

Odell v. Stout

United States Circuit Court

Decided October 15, 1884PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtSage, J.

Letters patent No. 250,934, for an improvement in roller-mills for crushing or grinding grain, middlings, and other material, were issued December 13, 1881, and reissued (No. 10,139) June 22, 1882, to the complainant Odell, who, (with the Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Company, his licensees,) sues for infringement. The object of the invention is stated in the specification to be to adjust the outer crushing or grinding rolls to or from the inner ones, and simultaneously to open or close the spouts or channels which control the discharge of-grain from the hopper to the feed rolls.

The first…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Miller v. Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Burr v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  4. Grant v. RaymondSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  5. Roberts v. RyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1875

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ensten v. Simon, Ascher & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Automatic Weighing Mach. Co. v. Pneumatic Scale Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1909
  3. Harper v. ZimmermannDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1930
  4. Kennicott Water Softener Co. v. BainCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1911
  5. H. W. Roos Co. v. McMillanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API