Tompkins-Hawley-Fuller Co. v. Holden
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Suit by thes Tompkins-Hawley-Fuller Company against Amos F. Holden, trading as the Little Falls Paper Company. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiff appeals. The plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Oregon, of which state it is a citizen.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Suit by thes Tompkins-Hawley-Fuller Company against Amos F. Holden, trading as the Little Falls Paper Company. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiff appeals. The plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Oregon, of which state it is a citizen. The defendant is a citizen of the state of New York, and has a regular and established place of business within the Southern district of New York. The suit is in equity for infringement of United Stoles letters patent to Frederick…
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The patent in suit is for certain new and useful improvements in paper-making machines. The invention relates especially to machines for handling tissue or other thin papers, and is ’particularly applicable to what is known as the Harper-Fourdrinier type of machine, although also applicable to other paper machines, as, for example, to those of the cylinder type. The object of the invention is to prevent the pulp from sticking to the upper metal press roll of the paper-making machine and to cause it to be carried unbroken to the “driers.”
[1] A paper-making…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Johns-Manville Corporation v. National Tank Seal Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- R. M. Hollingshead Co. v. Bassick Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- David Belais, Inc. v. Goldsmith Bros. Smelting & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Better Packages, Inc. v. L. Link & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Royal-Eastern Electrical Supply Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1925
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.