Legal Opinion
Garland E. CHING, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. MITRE CORPORATION, Defendant, Appellee
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 10, 1990No. 90-1502PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Garland E. Ching (“Ching”) appeals from a decision by the district court granting summary judgment and dismissing his discrimination action against the MITRE Corporation (“MI-TRE”). The ground for dismissal was that Ching’s action was barred by the applicable state and federal three year statutes of limitations, Mass.Gen.L. eh. 151B, § 9; and 29 U.S.C. §§ 255(a) & 626(e). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Ching was hired by MITRE as part of its technical staff on December 1, 1980. On October 5, 1985, he was operated on for a corneal transplantation with…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Chardon v. FernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Royal Canin U. S. A. v. WullschlegerSupreme Court of the United States · 2025
- Marvin D. Baker v. The Board of Regents of the State of Kansas and University of Kansas Medical School--School of MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Juan Rivera-Muriente v. Juan Agosto-AliceaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Abraham v. Woods Hole Oceanographic InstituteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Williams v. Raytheon Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.