Legal Opinion
Rossini v. Ogilvy & Mather, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 13, 1984No. 78 Civ. 1713PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GAGLIARDI, District Judge.
Plaintiffs commenced this action against Ogilvy & Mather, Inc. (“O & M”), an advertising agency, alleging employment discrimination based on sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”). 1 The case was tried without a jury from October 3, 1983 through November 15, 1983. The court now makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 52(a), Fed.R.Civ.P.
Facts
At the end of 1976, O & M employed approximately 800 employee's in New York City. About 200 of those employees were office…
2Cases cited100 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carlotta Rossini and Jane Zukofsky, on Behalf of Themselves and All Persons Similarly Situated v. Ogilvy & Mather, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Mazzella v. RCA Global Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Koster v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Korwek v. HuntDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Selzer v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.