Legal Opinion

Selzer v. Board of Education

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 19, 1986No. 82 Civ. 7783(MEL)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LASKER, District Judge.

Mary Selzer and Ann Juliano Jawin, two female guidance counselors employed by defendant Board of Education of the City of New York (“Board of Education”), bring this action on behalf of a purported class under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.) (“Title VII”), Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. § 1681) and the Civil Rights Act of 1871 (42 U.S.C. § 1983). They allege that since at least 1972, the defendants, who are the Board of Education, Frank J.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Krueger v. New York Telephone Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  2. Kanawi v. Bechtel Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
  3. Bishop v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
  4. Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
  5. In re Live Concert Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API