Legal Opinion
Koster v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 28, 1985No. 81 Civ. 5018 (PKL)PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge:
This is a suit for gender discrimination in employment. Plaintiff Carolee Koster has asserted numerous claims against her former employer, Chase Manhattan Bank (“Chase”), and Allan Ross, her immediate superior at Chase, under federal and state law, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief as well as damages. On January 7, 1983, Judge Goettel, to whom this case was originally assigned, denied defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint. Koster v. Chase Manhattan Bank, 554 F.Supp. 285 (S.D.N.Y.1983). He held that plaintiff had properly alleged a…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Meiri v. DaconCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lambert v. Genesee HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Wahlstrom v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Mazzella v. RCA Global Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Neufeld v. NeufeldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.