Legal Opinion
Kawashima v. Mukasey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 1, 2008No. 04-74313, 05-74408PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Petitioner’s “Amended Petition for Rehearing With a Suggestion for an En Banc Hearing” is GRANTED. The opinion filed on September 18, 2007, and appearing at 503 F.3d 997 (9th Cir.2007) is withdrawn. The superseding opinion will be filed concurrently with this order.
Petitioner’s “Motion For Leave to File a Response to the Reply of the United States to the Appellant’s Amended Petition for Rehearing” is DENIED as moot.
The parties may file new petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc as provid*1113ed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40.
OPINION
2Per curiam
We are called upon to decide whether…
3Cases cited18 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Gonzales v. Duenas-AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Javier Rivera-Sanchez, A/K/A Jose SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Navarro-Lopez v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by35 opinions
- Nijhawan v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Aguila-Montes De OcaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. BolesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Flora Andrea Rodriguez Asalde v. First Class Parking Systems LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Alanis-Alvarado v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.