Legal Opinion
Dodd v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 2, 2004No. 99,726PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BUETTNER, Presiding Judge.
1 Plaintiff/Appellant Leslie Dodd appeals from the trial court's denial of her quest for additional uninsured motorist (UM) benefits from Defendant/Appellee Alistate Insurance Company (Allstate). Allstate paid $20,000, asserting that was the policy limit. Dodd argued she was entitled to another $10,000 by operation of law. The matter was tried to the court on stipulations of fact and the trial court found Allstate owed nothing more on the policy. Because the trial court correctly found Dodd was not entitled to additional UM coverage, we affirm.
{2 In her Petition,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Russell v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
- Beauchamp Ex Rel. Beauchamp v. Southwestern National Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Withrow v. PickardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Kinder v. Oklahoma Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
- Wilson v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. MusgroveCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- Spears v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Russell Brent Musgrove, Jr.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017