State v. Mouelle
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
CHUTICH, Justice.
*710Appellant Vern Jason Mouelle was found guilty by a jury of first-degree premeditated murder and first-degree premeditated murder of an unborn child. In this direct appeal, Mouelle asserts four claims. He first contends that structural error occurred when the district court judge presided over Mouelle's jury trial after hearing a comment by defense counsel during an ex parte conversation that suggested that Mouelle might commit perjury. Mouelle next argues that his right to effective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution was violated…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Jamal L. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- Andrew Vernard Glover v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2026
- Berry Alexander Davis, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025
- Jamal Lindsey Smith v. Lisa Stenseth, “Warden” of MCF Rush City, and Dan Dahlberg, “Commissioner of Corrections”District Court, D. Minnesota · 2026
- Mouelle v. SchnellDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.