Legal Opinion

State of Minnesota v. Jamal L. Smith

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 24, 2024No. A230007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A23-0007 Hennepin County Chutich, J. Concurring, Thissen, Procaccini, JJ. Took no part, Hennesy, J. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Filed: July 24, 2024 Office of Appellate Courts Jamal L. Smith, Appellant. ________________________ Keith Ellison, Attorney General, Saint Paul, Minnesota; and Mary F. Moriarty, Hennepin County Attorney, Mark W. Osler, Deputy Hennepin County Attorney, Adam E. Petras, Assistant Hennepin County Attorney, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondent. Cathryn Middlebrook, Chief Appellate Public Defender, Davi E. Axelson, Assistant…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. Leake v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jamal Lindsey Smith v. Lisa Stenseth, “Warden” of MCF Rush City, and Dan Dahlberg, “Commissioner of Corrections”District Court, D. Minnesota · 2026
  2. State of Minnesota v. Nicholas James FirkusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API