Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Washburn Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 12, 1946No. 8965PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPARKS, Circuit Judge.
This cause is presented to us for a second time, this appeal being from a judgment on the merits of the cause, dismissing the complaint, and directing the fullest allowance of costs permissible.
This court had earlier reversed a judgment of the District Court dismissing appellant’s complaint on defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. 7 Cir., 145 F.2d 715. The theory on which the dismissed complaint was based was that appellant was entitled to have appellee declared a trustee ex maleficio of a patent alleged to have been wrongly applied for and issued to an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Kennedy v. HazeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Friedman v. Washburn Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Vincennes Steel Corporation v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- Kirby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921
3Cited by17 opinions
- Perlman v. FeldmannDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1953
- Kemart Corporation, a Corporation v. Printing Arts Research Laboratories, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Howard Farmer v. Arabian American Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Bank of America v. Loew's International CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Koehring Company v. National Automatic Tool Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.