Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Schuster v. Anderson

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided July 12, 2005No. C04-4089-MWBPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND PLAINTIFF SCHUSTER’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED AND SUBSTITUTED COMPLAINT

BENNETT, Chief Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND .1075

A. Procedural Background.1075

B. Factual Background.1078

1. Relationships of the parties .1078

2. Yournet related entities & the Witherspoon affair .1078

3. Plaintiffs’ investments in Yournet related entities and the Witherspoon affair.1079

II. LEGAL ANALYSIS.1081

A. Rule 12(b)(6) Standards .1081

B. Civil RICO Claims — Counts XIV-XVI.1083

1. The RICO claims generally.1083

2Cases cited97 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. AMERICAN PALLET LEASING INC.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2009
  2. City of Perry v. Procter & Gamble Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. Remmes v. International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2005
  4. Remmes v. International Flavors & Fragrances, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2006
  5. Schuster v. AndersonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API