Legal Opinion
In re Jackson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 7, 2001No. 00-BG-1465PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
On November 14, 2000, the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) issued a report and recommendation concerning Clinton A. Jackson. In its report, the Board found that Jackson violated the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct by intentionally misappropriating funds, commingling funds, failing to maintain proper records for his trust account, and failing to protect his client’s interests after his representation was terminated. The Board recommended that he be disbarred. Neither Bar Counsel nor Jackson has filed an exception to the Board’s recommendation.
We are required to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re CarlsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In Re DietzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re HollisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002