Legal Opinion

Fujitsu America, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 6, 2004No. Consol. 00-00429PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CARMAN, Judge.

Plaintiffs Fujitsu America, Inc. and Fujitsu IT Holdings, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) move for summary judgment. Plaintiffs challenge the United States Customs Service’s 1 (“Customs”), classification of the Coolant Distribution Unit of the Amdahl 5995M Series Processor mainframe computer. Defendant cross-moves for summary judgment, asserting that the Coolant Distribution Unit was properly classified as liquidated, under heading 8419 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”). This Court has jurisdiction to review this matter under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) (2000).…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fujitsu America, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Applikon Biotechnology, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API