Legal Opinion

Ratliff v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 10, 1979No. 79-275PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The only issue on appeal in this case is whether a non-resident of Arkansas, who contracted to buy Arkansas land, is subject to the personal jurisdiction of an Arkansas Court in a foreclosure suit on the land.

This lawsuit involves the sale of land located in Crittenden County, Arkansas. The appellant, M. E. Ratliff, signed a contract to buy the land in November, 1976; in March, 1977, the transaction was closed. However, the named purchaser when the deal was closed was not Ratliff, but the W. D. George Cotton Company, a company in which Ratliff owned half the stock.

Two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Krone v. AMI, INC.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1973
  3. Bowsher v. DigbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Horne v. Savers Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. McMurtray v. McMurtraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Ballentine v. BallentineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Scottsdale Insurance Co. v. Morrow Land Valley Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API