Legal Opinion

Ballentine v. Ballentine

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 1, 1982No. 81-212PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellant brought this action to recover damages based upon an asserted fraudulent representation by appellees in violation of state and federal securities acts. The Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 applies to “the offer or sale of any security.” 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 (1981). 15 U.S.C. § 77 q. The Arkansas Securities Act applies to “the offer, sale or purchase of any security.” Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 67-1235 and 67-1256 (Repl. 1980). The appellant contends that the chancellor erred in finding that these state and federal securities laws were inapplicable to the facts of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ratliff v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adkinson v. KilgoreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  2. Gray v. RaglandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. C & C Electric Construction Co. v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API