Legal Opinion

United States v. Anaconda Wire & Cable Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 1943No. Civ. A. No. 3083Published

1Opinion of the Court

BARD, District Judge.

This matter arises on defendant Anaconda’s motions to quash the return of service of the summons on it and to dismiss the complaint or to stay further proceedings in the action.

The action was instituted under the Revised Statutes of the United States, Sections 3490 to 3493, 31 U.S.C.A. §§ 231 to 234, by Helen M. Reichmann, in the name of the United States and in her own name as informer, to recover damages and penalties imposed by these sections for defrauding the United States.

Section 3490, 31 U.S.C.A. § 231, provides that any person not in the armed forces of the United…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Salinger v. LoiselSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. United States Ex Rel. Kessler v. Mercur Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  4. Beadleston v. SpragueNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  5. United States Ex Rel. Salzman v. Salant & Salant, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API