Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club
Supreme Court of the United States
1DissentJustice Stevens, joined by Justice Brennan, Justice Marshall, and Justice Blackmun
Even though the Court may regard the practice as “novel, costly, and intuitively unsatisfying,” ante, at 687, n. 8, it is not at all unusual for a government to pay an unsuccessful adversary’s counsel fees; indeed, in the largest category of litigation in which governments engage — criminal litigation— they do so routinely.1 The question presented in this case is whether Congress has authorized any such award in a challenge to rulemaking by the Environmental Protection Agency. Today the Court holds that, no matter how exceptional the circumstances may be, Congress intended such awards to be…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.