Legal Opinion

Sentinel Co. v. Dinwiddie

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 28, 1930No. 4347PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellee brought this action to recover damages occasioned by appellant’s publicaH°n an alleged libel. The verdict of the 3my m appellee’s favor was, on his motion, ^ aside as inadequate and a new trial granted. This appeal is from the order granting the new trial.

Appellee moves this court to dismiss the appeal because the order is not an appealable one. Upon the authority of Dry Dock E. B. & B. R. Co. v. Petkunas (C. C. A.) 261 F. 988; Wright v. Taft-Peirce Mfg. Co. (C. C. A.) 287 F. 131; and Fort Dodge Portland *58Cement Corp. v. Monk (C. C. A.) 276 F. 113, the motion must he granted.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ft. Dodge Portland Cement Corp. v. MonkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  2. Wright v. Taft-Peirce Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1923
  3. Dry Dock, E. B. & B. R. Co. v. PetkunasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Busam Motor Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
  2. United Retail Cleaners & Tailors Ass'n v. DenahanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Long v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  4. De Grazia v. AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API