Legal Opinion
De Grazia v. Anderson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 15, 1948No. 587PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
This case is here on defendant’s appeal from an order granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial in a landlord-tenant case. Appellee has moved to dismiss the appeal.
Twice before in' similar situations we have refused to entertain such, an appeal. Phillips v. Marvin’s Credit, D.C.Mun.App., 35 A.2d 825; United Retail Cleaners & Tailors Ass’n v. Denahan, D.C.Mun.App., 44 A.2d 69. In the Phillips case we dismissed the appeal, pointing out that an order granting a new trial is not a final judgment within the meaning of the Act creating this court.1 We also said that when a new trial has been…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hume v. BowieSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. BeattySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Hunt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- United Retail Cleaners & Tailors Ass'n v. DenahanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- MacFarland v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- De Grazia v. AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- Students Book Co. v. SemerjianDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
- Sellers v. TaylorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955