Legal Opinion

Lebovitz v. Mudd

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 9, 1986PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Appellants brought these actions against respondents and the other defendants for fraud and unfair trade practices arising out of sales of property on Daufuskie Island. Appellants’ complaints also contained causes of action alleging respondents had made fraudulent conveyances proscribed by S. C. Code Ann. § 27-23-10 (1976). To give notice of their claims to set aside the fraudulent conveyances, appellants filed and served notices of lis pendens covering ten parcels of property, only one of which was involved in the fraud and unfair trade practice claims.

Respondents moved under Rule…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miles v. Charleston Light & Water Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  2. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. WilkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  3. Melton v. WalkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Link v. School District of Pickens CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  2. Murphy v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Wetzel v. Woodside Development Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  4. Murphy v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  5. Tillman v. TillmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API