Legal Opinion
Wetzel v. Woodside Development Ltd. Partnership
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 6, 2005No. 25999PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Justice MOORE:
Appellants, James and Shirley Wetzel (hereinafter collectively referred to as Wetzel), appeal the circuit court’s order quashing Wetzel’s affidavit and motion alleging default by respondent, Richard B. Steele (Steele). This matter was certified from the Court of Appeals pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR.
PROCEDURAL FACTS
On April 4, 2003, appellants brought an action alleging unfair trade practices against Woodside Development Limited Partnership, a real estate developer; WSC Corporation, the Partnership’s managing partner; Woodside Ventures, LLC, the house builder; and Steele, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Farmer v. Monsanto Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Rowe v. HyattSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Jefferson v. Gene's Used Cars, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
- Murphy v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Townsend v. City of DillonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thornton v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Corp. (SCE & G)Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
- Graham Law Firm, P.A. v. MakawiSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012