Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided June 11, 2001No. 3354Published
1Opinion of the Court
346 S.C. 37 (2001)
550 S.E.2d 589
Janet B. MURPHY and David M. Murphy, Appellants,
v.
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, ACandS, Inc., Rock Wool Manufacturing Co., Inc., The Anchor Packing Company, Rapid American Corporation, Garlock, Inc., Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Uniroyal, Inc., PPG Industries, Inc., Covil Corporation, E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company, Defendants, Of whom Rapid American Corporation and E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company are, Respondents.
No. 3354.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina.
Heard November 7, 2000.
Decided June 11, 2001.
Rehearing…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Baird v. Charleston CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Shipes v. Piggly Wiggly St. Andrews, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Lipe v. C. C. & O. Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- State Ex Rel. McLeod v. C & L CORP. INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Ophuls & Hill, Inc. v. Carolina Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.