Legal Opinion

State v. Burchfield

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 7, 1976No. 7627SC231PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant was convicted of feloniously receiving stolen goods. Judgment imposing a prison sentence of not less than 9 nor more than 10 years was entered. Since an erroneous portion of the charge requires that we order a new trial, we consider it unnecessary to set out the facts of the case.

*129The judge, in his charge to the jury, repeatedly told the jury they might convict if they found . . defendant knew or had reasonable grounds to believe . . that the goods were stolen. Jury instructions of like import have been consistently disapproved when guilty knowledge was an element to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . StathosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. State v. GrantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. St. ClairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HagemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API