Legal Opinion

Asbell v. State

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 10, 1898No. 10870PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from Labette district court; A. H. Skidmore, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Doster, C. J. :

The parties to this action have adopted a practice which assimilates the controversy to a proceeding in error, without inquiring whether such practice is correct. It will nevertheless be so treated, and the parties and proceeding designated accordingly. The error claimed is in an order of the district court refusing to entertain jurisdiction of an application by the plaintiff for a new trial. Marion Asbell was convicted of the crime of murder, and upon appeal to this court the judgment of conviction was affirmed. (The State v. As*52bell, 57…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CalhounSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  2. State v. AsbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  3. Rose v. GovernorTexas Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Asbell v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  2. Heman Construction Co. v. CapperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  3. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Phillips v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  5. Purity Oats Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API