Legal Opinion

Application of Kenneth B. Cofer

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 13, 1966No. Patent Appeal 7449PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the examiner's rejection of claims 1 and 8 in appellant’s application 1 entitled “High Purity Diepoxide.’’

The subject matter is reflected in claims 1 and 8:

1. As a manufacture, free-flowing crystals of 2,2-bis (2,3-epoxypro-poxyphenyl) propane.

8. As a manufacture, free-flowing crystals of substantially pure 2,2-bis (2,3-epoxypropoxyphenyl) propane characterized by a sharp melting point of about 43.5 °C, a weight-to-epoxide ratio of about 170 grams per gram equivalent epoxide, total chlorine content of less…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Application of WilliamsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  2. Application of Donald Wallace Adamson and Walter Mark DuffinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Application of Sune Bergstrom and Jan SjovallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Application of William C. AnthonyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  3. Application of Robert Joly and Julien WarnantCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  4. In re PardoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  5. Application of Wilhelm Ahlert and Ernst KrugerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API