Application of Kenneth B. Cofer
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the examiner's rejection of claims 1 and 8 in appellant’s application 1 entitled “High Purity Diepoxide.’’
The subject matter is reflected in claims 1 and 8:
1. As a manufacture, free-flowing crystals of 2,2-bis (2,3-epoxypro-poxyphenyl) propane.
8. As a manufacture, free-flowing crystals of substantially pure 2,2-bis (2,3-epoxypropoxyphenyl) propane characterized by a sharp melting point of about 43.5 °C, a weight-to-epoxide ratio of about 170 grams per gram equivalent epoxide, total chlorine content of less…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Application of WilliamsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
- Application of Donald Wallace Adamson and Walter Mark DuffinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
3Cited by18 opinions
- Application of Sune Bergstrom and Jan SjovallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of William C. AnthonyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Application of Robert Joly and Julien WarnantCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- In re PardoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Application of Wilhelm Ahlert and Ernst KrugerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.