Legal Opinion

Mulford v. Central Life Assurance Society

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1913No. 3937Published

Error to Denver District Court. Hon. George W. Allen, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Cunningham, Presiding Judge.

1. Plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, entered into a written contract with the defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, whereby plaintiff became financial director of the company, for the city and county of Denver, and assumed divers and sundry responsibilities and duties towards *528the company, for which he was to receive, as compensation, a certain percentage of the premiums paid to the company on policies written by it in the city and county of Denver. Plaintiff becoming convinced that he had been induced to enter into the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Central Life Assurance Society v. MulfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  2. Jones v. PerotSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  3. Board of Public Works v. HaydenColorado Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Hoffman v. ImesMontana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Armor v. FiskSupreme Court of Colorado · 1869

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API