Armor v. Fisk
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from, District Court, Gilpin County. ■ First count in tke declaration was indebitatus assumpsit. . “For certain quartz lode mining claims, lode claims, gulch, claims, quartz mill claims, water mill claims, mill claims, water power, water privilege, flumes, buildings, stamp mills, water mills, tools and machinery, more particularly described as follows, to wit: Mining claims number (1) one, (5) five and the undivided half of number (6) six, on the Fisk lode, east from…
Read the full summary
Appeal from, District Court, Gilpin County. ■ First count in tke declaration was indebitatus assumpsit. . “For certain quartz lode mining claims, lode claims, gulch, claims, quartz mill claims, water mill claims, mill claims, water power, water privilege, flumes, buildings, stamp mills, water mills, tools and machinery, more particularly described as follows, to wit: Mining claims number (1) one, (5) five and the undivided half of number (6) six, on the Fisk lode, east from discovery. Also, claims number (1) one, and (2) two, on the Gregory extension lode, number (1) one being the discovery…
1Opinion of the Court
Hallett, 0. J.
In the investigation of this case we have not found it necessary to consider all the objections to the record made by the appellant. The rights of the parties are established by the two papers of date April 5,1864, and the agreement of November 11, 1863, to which reference is made in those papers, and we shall confine the discussion to those instruments. We learn from the agreement of November 11, 1863, that the appellee was jointly interested with the appellant in certain property described therein, which the latter held by deed from the former ; if the appellant should sell…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Bates v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Mulford v. Central Life Assurance SocietyColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
- Mulford v. Central Life Assurance SocietyColorado Court of Appeals · 1913