Legal Opinion
Board of Public Works v. Hayden
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided January 15, 1899No. 1738PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.
1Opinion of the CourtThomson, P. J.
Petition for a writ of mandamus commanding the board of public works of the city of Denver to allow to William Hayden an estimate for work done by him in the month of November, 1897, under a grading contract between him and the city. Demurrer to the petition for want of facts sufficient to authorize the issuance of the writ. Demurrer overruled, leave to respondents to answer petition denied, and peremptory writ ordered. Case here by writ of error.
The application was upon notice, as provided by the code, and there was no alternative writ. The petition set forth the several proceedings had by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Kokomo v. MahanIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- In Matter of Petition of BurmeisterNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Taber v. GrafmillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Dickinson v. City Council of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Harwood v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Flanigan v. BurrittNevada Supreme Court · 1918
- Hover v. People ex rel. AdamsColorado Court of Appeals · 1902
- Hover v. People ex rel. AdamsColorado Court of Appeals · 1902
- Mulford v. Central Life Assurance SocietyColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
- Mulford v. Central Life Assurance SocietyColorado Court of Appeals · 1913