Legal Opinion
United States v. Nardone
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 11, 1990No. Civ. 90-163PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
KOSIK, District Judge.
Currently pending before the court are a motion for summary judgment and a motion to strike the counterclaim and dismiss the third party complaint. After appropriate briefing by the parties, these matters are now ripe for disposition. For the reasons that follow, the motion for summary judgment shall be granted, and the motion to strike the counterclaim and dismiss the third party complaint shall be granted as well.
I. Background
On October 31, 1989, a federal grand jury returned an indictment against defendant Joseph A. Nardone [hereinafter “Nardone”], charging…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Continental Insurance Co. v. Kenneth BodieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Israel Discount Bank Ltd. v. Robert M. Entin, Alexander Halberstein and Kan Rap, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- in Re Xerox Corporation and Xerox State Healthcare, LLC F/K/A Acs State Healthcare, LlcTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- United States ex rel. Miller v. Bill Harbert International Construction, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- United States ex rel. Branch Consultants, L.L.C. v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2010
- United States Ex Rel. Longhi v. Lithium Power Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.