Legal Opinion
City of Meriden v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 1, 2013No. AC 34290PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, C. J.
The plaintiff, the city of Meriden, appeals from the judgment of the Superior Court dismissing its administrative appeal from the decision of the defendant, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the town of Wallingford, denying its application for a special permit. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the defendant’s denial of the special permit application was not supported by substantial evidence.1 We disagree, *242and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to this appeal. In July, 2007, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Irwin v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Felician Sisters of St. Francis of Connecticut, Inc. v. Historic District CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Housatonic Terminal Corp. v. Planning & Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Cambodian Buddhist Society of Connecticut, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- St. Joseph's High School, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Putnam Park Apartments, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Parillo Food Grp., Inc. v. Bd. of Zoning Appeals of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016