Legal Opinion

Simpkins v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1884No. 9855PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Warren Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Best, C.

The appellee brought this action against the appellant Margaret E. Simpkins, her husband Robert J. Simpkins, and her son Justin C. Simpkins, to recover a judgment upon two notes made by the husband and son to Lasker O’Connell, who endorsed them to the appellee, and to set *471aside as fraudulent a conveyance made by the husband to the wife.

The complaint consisted of two paragraphs. The first was upon a note of $1,300, and the second upon the same note and another of $800, which had not then matured, both of which were made to Lasker O’Connell, and were alleged to have been assigned by him…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keller v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Dick v. HittIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Cooper v. DrouillardIndiana Supreme Court · 1839
  4. Campbell v. GouldIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carver v. CarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Barnett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Fiscus v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Moss v. JenkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Jones v. AngellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API